The American College of Physicians (ACP) issued a policy paper arguing that the term "provider" for physicians has ethical implications and contributes to the weakening of professional identity, trust, and the patient-physician relationship.[1] The use of the word "provider" turns the patient-physician relationship into a commercial transaction.[1] The term reflects broader trends such as the corporatization of medicine, increased physician employment, and market-oriented health care systems that lead to deprofessionalization.[1] "Provider" obscures differences in training, expertise, and responsibilities between different clinics, which can confuse patients in complex teams.[1] The term mischaracterizes medical care, which is based on ethical obligations such as beneficence, nonmaleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice.[1] Physicians must put patients' interests before their own, even when this conflicts with financial or institutional pressures.[1] ACP recommends that we stop using "provider" for doctors and call them doctors instead; refer to broader teams as "clinicians" or "health professionals".[1] Maintaining ethical practice requires language that reflects the humanitarian obligations of medicine: relationships, professional judgment, and patient-centered care.[1]