Network meta-analysis of catheter ablation, rhythm control, and rate control strategies in atrial fibrillation with heart failure impact on mortality, cardiac function, and quality of life

Back to news list

Source: Frontiers Medicine

Original: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1656420...

Published: 2026-02-23T00:00:00Z

A network meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials including 5721 patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation compared catheter ablation (CA), rhythm control (RhC), rate control (RC) and their combination (Rh + RC). Catheter ablation best improved left ventricular ejection fraction (MD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.17–0.50) and reduced BNP levels (MD = −0.56, 95% CI −0.72 to −0.39). CA significantly reduced all-cause mortality (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.42–0.80) and heart failure hospitalization (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.40–0.96) compared with the combined control. RhC and RC showed moderate efficacy, while Rh + RC significantly improved quality of life scores according to the MLHFQ questionnaire. No strategies differed significantly in adverse events, with a marginal advantage of Rh + RC according to SUCRA. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to high according to GRADE. The study recommends CA as the preferred option, considering the patient's comorbidities.